Go to chapter: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39
Chapter 37 (page 184)
According to Feldman and Schiller (l983) the pathogenesis of diabetic gastroparesis
remained uncertain, but the evidence supported the view that a vagal autonomic
neuropathy was responsible. Feldman et al. (l984), using a radioloic method for
assessing gastric emptying of radio-opaque, indigestible solid particles with simultaneous
radionuclide scintigraphy of an 111In-labelled standard meal, showed that patients
with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus had an abnormally slow gastric emptying rate
for indigestible solids; emptying of digestible solids and liquids was close to normal.
Camilleri and Malagelada (l984) studied the fasting and fed manometric profiles of the
stomach and proximal small intestine in 14 patients with the clinical diagnosis of diabetic
gastroparesis. In 11 of the patients reduction in "antral" pressure activity with absent
interdigestive migrating motor complexes was seen. Three patients exhibited a "peculiar
continuous 3 minute antral contractile activity". In the small intestine abnormal
manometric patterns were observed in 12 patients, in 9 of whom non-propagated, long
bursts of powerful contractions occurred. The findings indicated that both in the stomach
and small bowel the motility disorder was not invariably of a paretic type. In the stomach
a reduction in frequency of amplitude of "antral" motor activity was the rule, but in a
minority of patients prolonged periods of contraction of low amplitude (less than 20 mm
Hg), occurred. This motor pattern indicated an abolition of the physiological cyclic
activity and was distinctly abnormal; the consistently low amplitude might be
insufficient to triturate solid food and empty the stomach. Clinically these patients had
the same symptoms as those with "antral" hypomotility, for whom the term gastroparesis
was perhaps more appropriate.
In symptomatic diabetic gastroparesis patients Achem-Karam et al. (l985) demonstrated
abnormal "antral" and duodenal activity, characterized by absence of phase III of the
interdigestive migrating motor complex; in 3 out of 6 patients the complex was also
absent in the remainder of the proximal small bowel. The findings confirmed some of
those previously described by Malagelada et al. (l980) and Camilleri and Malagelada
(l984).
Using a dual radionuclide technique, Wright et al. (l985) investigated gastric emptying of
solids and liquids in diabetic gastroparesis patients and normal controls. In both groups
the emptying rate of liquids was normal; emptying of solids was markedly delayed in the
diabetic group.
With a similar technique Horowitz et al. (l987) determined the effects of the prokinetic
drug cisapride in 20 insulin-dependent diabetic patients who had delayed gastric
emptying of the solid or liquid component of a meal, or both. It was found that cisapride
increased the emptying rate of both solids and liquids.
Yoshida et al. (l988) found no morphologic abnormalities of the abdominal vagus nerves,
the gastric musculature and myenteric plexuses in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.
In a review Varis (l989) defined diabetic gastroparesis as a delay of gastric emptying
without gastric outlet obstruction in patients with long-standing insulin requiring diabetes
mellitus. Characteristically the emptying of solids was delayed; in most cases the
emptying rate of liquids was within the normal range, although it might be decreased in
some patients. All normal motility patterns, e.g. adaptive relaxation and the maintenance
of tone in the proximal stomach, "antropyloric" peristaltic movements and phase III of
the interdigestive migrating motor complex might be lacking or abnormal. The "antral"
motility disorder, leading to retention of solid foods, was considered to be the most
characteristic feature of the condition.
As endoscopy may fail to demonstrate motor disorders of the stomach (Varis l989), it
does not play an important role in the diagnosis. However, endoscopy does show gastric
mucosal pathology such as acute erosions and gastritis, occurring in the majority of
patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (Carandang et al. l969), and it may help to exclude
mechanical pyloric obstruction (Camilleri and Malagelada l984).
From the above it is clear that gastric motility disturbances may occur both in
symptomatic and asymptomatic diabetes mellitus patients. In a small percentage of cases
these disorders may progress to diabetic gastroparesis, a condition usually occurring in
patients with a long history of inadequately controlled, insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus.
We have had occasion to do upper gastrointestinal radiological examinations in numerous
diabetic patients for a variety of reasons, over a period of years. Motility disturbances
were found in a small number of patients, both in insulin-dependent and non-insulin
dependent cases.
Previous Page | Table of Contents | Next Page
© Copyright PLiG 1998